[Liberty-eiffel] CLANG

[Hans Zwakenberg | Ocean Consulting GmbH]

The question arised because it would be cool to use CLANG on Windows.  Since then I learned that this compiler does not include a complete runtime and some of the header files need to be imported from another compiler.   Since I don't want to get trapped into having to maintain an assortment like that, CLANG (for now...) is off my list of contenders...

 

cheers

Hans

 

>
> 1. Re: CLANG / LVMM status? (Raphael Mack)

> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 19:07:08 +0000
> From: Raphael Mack <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Liberty-eiffel] CLANG / LVMM status?
> Message-ID:
> <address@hidden>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed; DelSp=Yes
>
> Mh, as nobody answers, I give a few comments. Even though I have no
> idea about the state. The LLVM wrapper was once working with some
> older version of LLVM but the LLVM backend llvmec is only a skeleton.
> So I think it is not worth trying it or wait until it can compile
> itself.
>
> I even tend to move the files to make the doc-generation eventually work.
>
> On the other side I think it would be cool to have an LLVM backend if
> anyone is intersed: feel free to continue hacking on it!
>
> Cheers,
> Rapha
>
> Zitat von Hans Zwakenberg | Ocean Consulting GmbH <address@hidden>:
>
> > Hi Group,
> >
> > what is the status of LLVM and/or CLANG ? Would less configuration
> > differences
> > exist between the various operating systems if I would try to get
> > CLANG working
> > on Windows?
> >
> > cheers
> > Hans
>
>