[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Javaweb-people] Re: gcj vs classpath merge status
From: |
Etienne M. Gagnon |
Subject: |
[Javaweb-people] Re: gcj vs classpath merge status |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jan 2002 15:24:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:0.9.7) Gecko/20020121 |
Nic Ferrier wrote:
In other words all brackets have a space in front of them except
method invocations.
This is very useful coz it means you can search for method
declerations by name quite easily.
Isn't etags meant for this? I dislike somewhat the assymmetry of your proposal.
However, since we are supposed to all code to a style it would be
useful if we all agreed on something.
It is simpler to have an automated tool; then you can (a) change idea, and (b)
reindent all the code according to the new idea by simply changing a switch on
the command line...
What I said a while ago was that if we all agreed on something then
I would happily update indent so that we can use it. It might take me
a while but I will do it (partly to learn about indent).
I think that indent is not the right approach, here. Java, unlike C/C++, has a
clean syntax. So you can build a "real parser" for it, and thus have a
**robust** indenter that handles **all** cases precisely. If I had time, I
would write a robust indenter in Java using SableCC, but I do not have the time...
So perhaps we should have a discussion here, because this is where all
the GNU-Java people are supposed to be.
Here is the list of current subscribers to this list:
address@hidden
address@hidden
address@hidden
address@hidden
address@hidden
address@hidden
address@hidden
If you think anyone else should be on here, either subscribe them
directly or let me know and I'll do it.
Mr Tromey: should Bryce be on here?
Nic
--
Etienne M. Gagnon http://www.info.uqam.ca/~egagnon/
SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/
SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/