info-member
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

More about the law school "IP" research


From: John Sullivan
Subject: More about the law school "IP" research
Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 18:37:43 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.96 (gnu/linux)

>From Richard Stallman:

The reason for the question about old law school course catalogs is
that we're looking for historical information that shows when use of
the propaganda term "intellectual property" became widespread.  We are
pretty sure this occurred in the 70s and 80s, but we want to find
objective evidence about it.

Since we know that the term was widely used in the late 90s, there is
no point sending references to the term from the 2000s.  They won't
show when the usage _started_.  Likewise, the rare uses from long ago
are not relevant to this question.

Law school course catalogues from the 70s and 80s can show when they
started using that term.  By checking them, you can provide evidence
that directly relates to the question.

The way to look at the old catalogues from the 70s and 80s is to phone
or visit the university library and ask where they are kept and how
you can look at them.

You may be able to think of other ways to measure when use of that
propaganda term became widespread.  If so, please try them -- that
information may be useful.

Information should be sent directly to address@hidden

-- 
John Sullivan
Campaigns Manager            | Phone: (617)542-5942 x23 | http://badvista.org
51 Franklin Street, 5th Fl.  | Fax:   (617)542-2652     | http://www.gnu.org
Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA    | GPG:   AE8600B6          | http://www.fsf.org

"Microsoft put all those functionality-crippling features into Vista because it
wants to own the entertainment industry. This isn't how Microsoft spins it, of
course. It maintains that it has no choice...It's all complete nonsense."
    --Bruce Schneier, "DRM in Windows Vista"




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]