[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?
From: |
Merciadri Luca |
Subject: |
Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups? |
Date: |
Fri, 07 May 2010 23:20:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
asjo@koldfront.dk (Adam Sjøgren) writes:
> On Fri, 07 May 2010 18:03:52 +0200, Merciadri wrote:
>
>> I then use `Newsgroups: ' and type `hiearchy.group1,hiearchy.group2'
>
>> * Why is Gnus repeatedly asking me if there are any follow-ups to my
>> * message? What are these?
>
> Gnus is asking you what group to put in the Followup-To header, which
> allows you to indicate in which of the groups you are posting to the
> discussion (any followups) should be directed to.
Okay. But giving nothing for followups should not prevent Gnus from
sending the article to the precited groups, should it?
> Crossposting is often not a good idea.
I know, but this was really justified here. (If it was not, I would
not have even tried it.)
>> * Is my way to specify the different posting groups (i.e. with a
>> * comma) correct? When trying to post to multiple groups, it never
>> * works, but when I use only one group, it works. Why?
>
> What do you mean "it never works"? Descrive what happens...
What happens is simple: an article (/thread) is never created in any
of the two groups that I specified in `Newsgroups'. But if I
individually send the article to each group, it appears in both
groups.
Why? Thanks.
- --
Merciadri Luca
See http://www.student.montefiore.ulg.ac.be/~merciadri/
- --
Liberty without learning is always in peril; learning without liberty
is always in vain. (John F. Kennedy)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.8 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>
iEYEARECAAYFAkvkhBAACgkQM0LLzLt8MhxsBwCfQc1FQksQ+a06i5p69DE+YryG
1QkAoKAHZxV1SghmcmTfaZeGarDRmqiJ
=TNo3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/05/07
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/05/07
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/05/07
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?,
Merciadri Luca <=
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/05/07
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/05/08
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/05/08
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/05/08
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/05/08
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/05/09
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/05/08
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/05/08
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Adam Sjøgren, 2010/05/08
- Re: Follow-Ups and multiple groups?, Merciadri Luca, 2010/05/08