[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Multilevel vendor branch import
From: |
Rodolfo Schulz de Lima |
Subject: |
Re: Multilevel vendor branch import |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Oct 2003 16:56:45 -0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Mon, Oct 27, 2003 at 01:22:23PM -0500, Greg A. Woods wrote:
> BTW, those are design limits, not bugs. They are caused by the way CVS
> tracks _the_ one vendor branch. The multiple vendor-branch hacks
I see, I've never considered them bugs. Just recently I 'discovered'
subversion (svn), a cvs like concurrent versioning system that covers a
lot of those "design limits" cvs has, including the one I've originally
talked about (and handling copy/move of a file, or an entire directory,...).
I really think that if CVS doesn't make some big changes in those design
limits, it will be replaced by svn when its 1.0 version arrives.
Rodolfo Lima.
Re: Multilevel vendor branch import, Ross Patterson, 2003/10/28