[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: question about importing
From: |
Schwenk, Jeanie |
Subject: |
RE: question about importing |
Date: |
Mon, 9 Sep 2002 13:36:54 -0700 |
Larry,
Thank you for making importing clear.
Jeanie
-----Original Message-----
From: address@hidden [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Monday, September 09, 2002 12:28 PM
To: Schwenk, Jeanie
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re: question about importing
Schwenk, Jeanie writes:
>
> This is regarding a vendor branch. When the vendor sends us a new
version,
> we import rather than add. This is per Cederqvist 13.2 "Updating with the
> import command" and Chapter 6 "Tracking Third-Party Sources: Vendor
> Branches" in Fogel's book. Perhaps I have misunderstood what these two
> instruct. I thought I had to have the vendor branch checked out. This is
> wrong?
Yes, it is. You do *NOT* want to have the vendor branch checked out.
> Are we just supposed to unjar the source files into a
> new directory and run the import command?
Exactly. Importing the second (or third, or fourth, etc.) time is
exactly like importing the first time except that you specify a
different release tag. You should specify exactly the same repository
directory and vendor tag as the first time, and you should import from a
new directory, not a CVS working directory.
-Larry Jones
This sounds suspiciously like one of Dad's plots to build my character.
-- Calvin