[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Ampersand module question
From: |
Jay Glanville |
Subject: |
Re: Ampersand module question |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Apr 2002 12:57:19 GMT |
"Pierre Asselin" <address@hidden> wrote in message
news:address@hidden
> In <address@hidden> "Jay
Glanville" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> >Thanks Martin. It's a good start, but not all that I was looking for.
By
> >using the "-d" option, what I'm doing is "front-loading" the naming
> >architecture. In other words, anytime I use module amp1, it will be
under a
> >directory tools
>
> I create dummy modules for that purpose. For example,
>
> amp1 path/to/amp1
> amp2 path/to/amp2
> _amp1 -d tools/amp1 path/to/amp1
> mod path/to/mod &_amp1 &2
>
> The convention is that a module beginning with an underscore is not
> meant to be checked out by itself --although nothing prevents you to.
>
Thanks Pierre. This makes sense.
JDG