[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
unedit vs. update -C
From: |
Piet Verhoeve |
Subject: |
unedit vs. update -C |
Date: |
Wed, 27 Feb 2002 15:28:50 +0100 |
Hi,
When I use "cvs edit
foo.c" to notify the cvs system that I'm changing the file, I can undo that
change by calling "cvs unedit foo.c" OR by calling "cvs update -C
foo.c".
Both solutions
revert the changes however "update -C" creates a backup of the changes (a .#
file) while the "unedit" command does not.
Is this normal CVS
behaviour or can I change a setting such that "cvs unedit" will also create
backup files for the user ?
thanks,
Piet
V.
Ir. Piet Verhoeve, PhD
Sr. Research Associate
Televic N.V
Leo Bekaertlaan
1
8870 Izegem (Belgium)
Tel. +32 51 30 30 45
Fax. +32 51 31 06 70
email: address@hidden
web: www.televic.com
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- unedit vs. update -C,
Piet Verhoeve <=