[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS Update Behaviour
From: |
Noel Yap |
Subject: |
Re: CVS Update Behaviour |
Date: |
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 06:37:35 -0800 (PST) |
--- "Greg A. Woods" <address@hidden> wrote:
> [ On Friday, February 22, 2002 at 13:25:37 (-0800),
> Paul Sander wrote: ]
> > Subject: Re: CVS Update Behaviour
> >
> > And every time a merge is done from a branch where
> a rename was done on
> > one of the branches.
>
> And what has been said about that for years now?
> DON'T DO THAT!!!!
Because the tool is broken under such circumstances.
It's broken because it claims to be concurrent, but
under such circumstances, it's not.
> > Not renaming files is a fine workaround for
> lacking the ability to rename
> > files, if you can live with it. You can obviously
> live with it, but some
> > of us cannot.
>
> Who said you can't rename files? You just have to
> plan for it.
And serialize development while you're doing it.
Noel
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games
http://sports.yahoo.com
- Re: CVS Update Behaviour, (continued)
- Re: CVS Update Behaviour, Paul Sander, 2002/02/25
- Re: renames under CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/25
- Re: renames under CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/25
- Re: CVS Update Behaviour, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/25
- Re: CVS Update Behaviour, Paul Sander, 2002/02/26
- Re: CVS Update Behaviour, Noel Yap, 2002/02/26
- Re: CVS Update Behaviour,
Noel Yap <=
- Re: CVS Update Behaviour, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/24
- Re: renaming under CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/24
- Re: renaming under CVS, Mark D. Baushke, 2002/02/25
- Re: renaming under CVS, Mark, 2002/02/25
- Re: renaming under CVS, Paul Sander, 2002/02/26
- Re: renaming under CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/25
- Re: renaming under CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/25
- Re: renaming under CVS, Paul Sander, 2002/02/26
- Re: renaming under CVS, Noel Yap, 2002/02/26
- Re: renaming under CVS, Greg A. Woods, 2002/02/26