Re: update

[Kaz Kylheku]

In article <address@hidden>, Walsh, Matthew wrote:
>What I want is:
>
>cvs co -rTAG module
>cvs update -rBRANCH
>
>without losing anything out of my sandbox that isn't BRANCHed.

I'd love to tell you that the branched/non-branched mixing you are
doing is a poor idea CM, but then I suspect you'd probably tell me that
my viewpoint is rather naive, and that people all over do this with
superior, proprietary tools.

-- 
Meta-CVS: version control with directory structure versioning over top of CVS.
http://users.footprints.net/~kaz/mcvs.html