[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Accidentally merged out code.
From: |
Eric Siegerman |
Subject: |
Re: Accidentally merged out code. |
Date: |
Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:47:50 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
On Wed, Mar 28, 2001 at 01:43:57AM -0700, Andy Bradford wrote:
> trying to convince others that have never used [CVS] before, that suddenly
> attribute all their problems to it, is difficult and I need reasons. I
> can't just simply say ``you screwed up.'' I know it's due to human
> error, but need to make others see this light. :-)
"cvs history" can be useful. The only time I ever used it was to
prove user error in a case something like this. I can't remember
the details, though; sorry.
--
| | /\
|-_|/ > Eric Siegerman, Toronto, Ont. address@hidden
| | /
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea.
- RFC 1925 (quoting an unnamed source)
- Accidentally merged out code., Andy Bradford, 2001/03/27
- Re: Accidentally merged out code., Alexander Kamilewicz, 2001/03/28
- Re: Accidentally merged out code., Andy Bradford, 2001/03/28
- Re: Accidentally merged out code., Alexander Kamilewicz, 2001/03/29
- Re: Accidentally merged out code., Laine Stump, 2001/03/29
- cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, Gianni Mariani, 2001/03/29
- Re: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, Rob Helmer, 2001/03/29
- RE: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, Gianni Mariani, 2001/03/30
- RE: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, Greg A. Woods, 2001/03/30
- RE: cvswrappers - any better suggestions ?, Gianni Mariani, 2001/03/30