Re: history of the tags (was: hitory of the tags)

[Derek R. Price]

Donald Sharp wrote:

> Here are some sample cvs history -T output(s):
>
> T 2000-11-29 15:21 +0000 sharpd bar.c 1.3 [d:A]
> T 2000-11-29 15:21 +0000 sharpd foo.c 1.1 [d:A]
> T 2000-11-29 15:21 +0000 sharpd bar.c 1.4 [b:M]
> T 2000-11-29 15:22 +0000 sharpd bar.c     [b:D]
> T 2000-11-29 15:22 +0000 sharpd foo.c     [b:D]
>
> Is this ok?  What do people think?

Oh, and you should come up with a new record type besides 'T' so that histories
won't have to be reset once this change goes in and scripts will be able to 
easily
distinguish between an old record type and a new one without counting fields.

Derek
--
Derek Price                      CVS Solutions Architect ( http://CVSHome.org )
mailto:address@hidden     OpenAvenue ( http://OpenAvenue.com )
--
116. (A)bort, (R)etry, (P)retend this never happened...