Re: [igraph] How bad an idea is to access the igraph_vector_t and igraph_matrix_t structs directly?

[Szabolcs Horvát]

I'm sorry, I realize I made a mistake and igraph does store matrices
in column major order.

On 30 August 2015 at 21:12, Szabolcs Horvát <address@hidden> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> The igraph_vector_t and igraph_matrix_t structs don't seem to be
> documented.  Does this mean that they are not meant to be used by end
> users and I should stick to the documented API instead of accessing
> the structs directly?
>
> For my use case, working with the structs is just more convenient,
> especially for matrices.  I use C++ style being and end iterators
> which seems to be stored int he struct and stor_begin and end.  I need
> to copy matrices as fast as possible in row-major order, which seems
> to be the internal storage format, while  matrix_copy_to() uses
> column-major format.
>
> So, to sum up: how stable is this interface and is it very risky is I
> use it directly?
>
> Szabolcs