Re: l4-hurd

[Neal H. Walfield]

> > It has come to my attention that the principal designers of the Hurd
> > are not subscribed to the l4-hurd list.  This is fine.  My current
> > plan is to hold the design discussions on this list.  If you would
> > prefer another place, please let me know.
> 
> Which "this list" did you mean?  

I meant "that list" which is to say address@hidden

> I just now subscribed to l4-hurd, which I am happy to receive
> assuming the volume is small.

Typically it has been.

> If you wanted to carry on discussions about L4-related issues on
> hurd-devel, I think that would be fine too.

I think using hurd-devel excludes the L4 people who could be a good
source of insight.