[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Generalising @def*
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: Generalising @def* |
Date: |
Sat, 11 Feb 2023 20:11:22 +0100 |
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023 at 11:59:07AM +0000, Gavin Smith wrote:
>
> I've commited changes to texinfo.tex to introduce @defblock, @deflinex
> and @deftypelinex. @deflinex is like @deffnx and @deftypelinex is like
> @deftypefnx. The names of these could change, for example to remove the 'x'
> at the end of the commands, if we decide this would be better.
>
> I believe this covers usage for @defvr, @deftypevr, @deftp.
>
> I have gone off the idea of using @macro for this. I am thinking a
> more limited command would be better, as mentioned in an earlier message
>
> @newdef defbuiltin = typed, tt, Built-in Function, fn
>
> or similar. This would cover the basics and be easy to use and understand.
> The example here would translate a @defbuiltin line to a @deftypelinex line
> within a @defblock.
I do not like that, as this adds commands that are not in the language
and it is always a pain. I liked the generic command + separate index
entries, that could be grouped with @macro better.
--
Pat