[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Including files from parent dir
From: |
Patrice Dumas |
Subject: |
Re: Including files from parent dir |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Sep 2022 07:39:41 +0200 |
On Tue, Sep 13, 2022 at 08:14:48PM -0400, Stefan Monnier wrote:
>
> There's something I don't understand about @include:
>
> Say, I have:
>
> doc/foo.texi
> doc/gpl.texi
> bar.texi
>
> if my `foo.texi` has
>
> @include gpl.texi
> @include ../bar.texi
>
> I will be able to use successfully both
>
> cd doc; makeinfo --no-split foo.texi -o ../foo.info
>
> will work fine, but
>
> makeinfo --no-split doc/foo.texi -o foo.info
>
> will signal an error that it can't find `../bar.texi`
> (note: it *did* find `gpl.texi`).
>
> Why are the two includes treated differently?
It is because includes with leading . or .. in their paths in or include
that are absolute paths are treated differently from other includes:
they are not searched for in include directories.
Also, when you call
makeinfo --no-split doc/foo.texi -o foo.info
the doc/ directory is included in the @include search path in addition
to the current directory, therefore gpl.texi is found. The ../bar.texi
include file is still only searched for relative to the working directory.
Unless I missed something, none of these two information is documented.
> How can I convince `makeinfo` to find the `bar.texi` file in both cases?
Right now, I can't think of a way to make this happen. The only
thing I can think of would be to change the code to consider that
only paths with leading . are considered differently.
--
Pat