[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Copy of GFDL in copyright?
From: |
Simon Josefsson |
Subject: |
Copy of GFDL in copyright? |
Date: |
Mon, 02 Jul 2007 11:40:53 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/22.0.95 (gnu/linux) |
Russ, I just upgraded debian-shishi CVS for latest Shishi, and also
removed the copy of GFDL and pointed at /usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL
instead. Maybe I shouldn't have done the last step? I noticed your
earlier commit:
* Include a copy of the GNU Free Documentation License 1.2 in
debian/copyright as required by Policy 12.5.
Policy 12.5 says:
Packages distributed under the UCB BSD license, the Artistic license,
the GNU GPL, and the GNU LGPL, should refer to the corresponding files
under /usr/share/common-licenses,[82] rather than quoting them in the
copyright file.
However, [82] says:
For example, /usr/share/common-licenses/Artistic,
/usr/share/common-licenses/BSD, /usr/share/common-licenses/GPL,
/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL, /usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL,
/usr/share/common-licenses/GPL-2, and
/usr/share/common-licenses/LGPL-2.1, and so on. Note that the GFDL is
new here, and the license file may not yet be in place in
/usr/share/common-licenses/GFDL.
I'm not sure I follow the intention: either just the licenses mentioned
in 12.5 are OK to substitute with a reference, or all common licenses
distributed in base-files are OK to substitute with a reference. The
latter seems more flexible to me. Which is it?
Maybe the policy has changed in this area since you made the change
(2006-11-05) too.
Btw, I suspect we should wait with any upload until the GPLv3 license
has been reviewed by debian, and possibly also installed into
/usr/share/common-licenses/?
/Simon
- Copy of GFDL in copyright?,
Simon Josefsson <=