Re: nonlin_min function

[Kai Torben Ohlhus]

On 4/20/20 6:28 PM, Steph Bredenhann wrote:
> Dear Kai
> 
> In the mean time I have read the manuals again and again and searched
> Google and I have made the suggested change to MaxFunEvals already, have
> now increased to 4000 as you suggest, see the options as I have it now.
> 
> GPL_options =
> 
>   scalar structure containing the fields:
> 
>     AutoScaling = off
>     ComplexEqn = off
>     FunValCheck = off
>     FinDiffType = forward
>     Jacobian = off
>     MaxFunEvals =  4000
>     MaxIter =  1000
>     OutputFcn = [](0x0)
>     Updating = off
>     TolFun =  0.0000000010000
>     TolX =  0.0000000010000
>     TypicalX = [](0x0)
> 
> The outcome has now changed to:
> 
> fsolve outcome: GPL_info = 3:  improvement in objective function less
> than specified
> 
> As you can see I have made TolFun and TolX very small.
> 
> I have also changed my FUN to have a zero RHS as per the manual.
> 
> It seems to me that the model I am investigating just don’t have a
> solution with this search algorithm.
> 
> Thanks for your assistance, it is much appreciated.
> 
> -- 
> */Steph /*
> 


Dear Steph,

Can you attach the latest version of your m-files for debugging?

Thanks,
Kai