Re: Shrinked axes

[Pantxo]

mmuetzel wrote
> On 11 Oct 2019 12:00:09 +0300, Valdas Jankūnas wrote:
> 
> I see the same in Octave 5.1.0 and Octave 4.4.1. So it doesn't look like a
> recent regression.
> I also think this is a bug. Can you please open a report on savannah?
> https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?group=octave
> 
> Also setting the outerposition in pixel units seems to be off if the
> figure is larger.
> It looks like the area that is accounted for the labels and title is
> proportional to the figure extent instead of that of the outerpostion.
> 
> Fwiw, the axes have the expected dimensions in Matlab with your original
> example.
> 
> Markus

I don't think this is a bug per se, but rather a consequence of the way we
impose a minimal margin around axes boxes. Since the "looseinset" property
also exists as a hidden property in Matlab (or it used to), I expect the
very same result there.

Pantxo  



--
Sent from: https://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-General-f1599825.html