[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size'
From: |
Mike Miller |
Subject: |
Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size' |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Mar 2018 00:34:10 -0800 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.9.3 (2018-01-21) |
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 21:42:37 +0000, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> I don't agree with that. Because the final result, which is
> [_1,_2], is the same - regardless whether I do the assignment as
>
> ([_1,_2] = sort(im(:, 3), "descend"))
>
> or
>
> [_1,_2] = sort(im(:, 3), "descend").
Then that seems to be where your misunderstanding is. Both of those
statements are equivalent, but the syntax [_1,_2] on the left hand side
of the assignment is not a matrix, it is a comma-separated list.
https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/Comma-Separated-Lists.html
https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/matlab_prog/comma-separated-lists.html
--
mike
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- inconsitency in behavior of 'size', Sergei Steshenko, 2018/03/09
- Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size', Nicholas Jankowski, 2018/03/09
- Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size', Mike Miller, 2018/03/09
- Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size', Sergei Steshenko, 2018/03/09
- Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size',
Mike Miller <=
- Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size', Sergei Steshenko, 2018/03/10
- Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size', Mike Miller, 2018/03/10
- Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size', Sergei Steshenko, 2018/03/10
- Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size', Przemek Klosowski, 2018/03/12
- Re: inconsitency in behavior of 'size', Nicholas Jankowski, 2018/03/12