Re: nargout for methods

[mmuetzel]

Hi Jim,

have you considered inheriting from mvpoly and add your new methods in the
subclass. Something like this might work:

classdef myMVPoly < MVPoly
  methods
    function [M, v, nevals] = unstable(p, other, args)
      yada yada
    endfunction
  endmethods
endclassdef

I am not sure whether the subclass within a package can have the same name
as the superclass outside of any packages.

When you write "package", do you mean that you store all files in a
"+myPackage" folder? In this case, the constructor of your class should be
called by:
p = myPackage.MVPoly();
Or whatever the name of the "+" folder.

Cheers
Markus



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/nargout-for-methods-tp4684151p4684162.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.