Re: Critical matrix sparsity

[Nicholas Jankowski]

On Jun 8, 2017 5:52 PM, "siko1056" <address@hidden> wrote:

dariodematties wrote

 If
your matrix is really sparse, then the number of columns n should be smaller
than the number of rows m (transpose if not). Otherwise you waste space for
storing zero columns.

Maybe a naive side question, but wouldn't it make sense to have the transposition automatic and transparent as part of the storage class? A "transposed?" flag and the check would be the only overhead.