Re: datetick, reason for explicitly undocumented behavior?

[siko1056]

Jonathan Suever wrote
> It's worth noting that the OP was using the second example on the online
> documentation
> <https://octave.sourceforge.io/octave/function/datetick.html>
> as a guide which also incorrectly transposes the first two inputs. I have
> submitted a bug report to the bug tracker
> <https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49954>.
> 
> I'm more than happy to help fix this documentation error if someone can
> point me towards the best way to contribute changes towards the online
> documentation.
> 
> -Jonathan

As explained in the bug tracker [1] the change of the online documentation
[2] (actually it is a documentation maintained by Octave forge, the official
Octave documentation for the latest release is found at [3]) depends on a
page update by Carnë. But the state of Octave forge is kind of uncertain at
the moment [4].

Kai.

[1]: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?49954
[2]: https://octave.sourceforge.io/octave/function/datetick.html
[3]: https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/doc/interpreter/XREFdatetick.html
[4]:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Octave-Forge-Looking-for-a-new-leader-td4681121.html



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/datetick-reason-for-explicitly-undocumented-behavior-tp4681183p4681206.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.