Re: consistent legend size, interactive vs batch

[Ben Abbott]

> On Dec 30, 2016, at 08:36, johnsmith123 <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> NJank wrote
>> are you sure you're under fltk for the two non-gnuplot ones? 
>> ...
>> while the outputs change quite a bit between
>> graphics tookits, I do not get any differences between on-screen
>> appearance
>> or printed appearance
> 
> available_graphics_toolkits only reports 'gnuplot' and 'fltk'.
> i am merely concerned with differences in printed output of FLTK (gnuplot
> raises other issues but still produces the same inconsistencies between
> interactive and batch versions) in batch (run from script) vs. interactive
> mode.
> I used 'octave-cli --norc --silent' to produce those plots (with gnuplot
> commented and with the filename changed in interactive)
> The version i currently use was built from source, i might try to reproduce
> the issue later on a prebuilt version.

The legend size scales relative to the font size, not the plot size. Might that 
be the problem? Is so you can adjust the paperposition property in order to 
maintain the same plot size.

Ben