Re: "checking for cholmod_start in -lcholmod... no"

[Electronnix]

News Update:

I did a test and I eliminated METIS from the building process of
Suitesparse.
(Again I mention for the sake of details, I'm attempting to build
Octave 3.4.0 with Suitesparse 3.4.0 and Metis 4.0.1)

This means that in Suitesparse's UFconfig.mk I used the following:



Now, with these parameters, the Octave configure gives me the following:



So the idea is that if I don't use METIS from the start, then CHOLMOD comes
out fine.
But is there anything I can do to be able to use both METIS and CHOLMOD?



--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/checking-for-cholmod-start-in-lcholmod-no-tp4663980p4664120.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.