[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug with numel() and sparsity?
From: |
fork |
Subject: |
Re: Bug with numel() and sparsity? |
Date: |
Tue, 4 Mar 2014 00:12:05 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
Kai Torben Ohlhus <k.ohlhus <at> gmail.com> writes:
> Your problem might be related to the fact, that the standard octave uses
32 > bit indices rather than 64 bit [1].
I don't think so, in that everything else works properly, at least if I
replace numel(x) with prod(size(x)).
It might be that sedumi should use a different call, but it might be that
numel() could be written so that this doesn't happen.
It's all good, I patched my sedumi copy, just saying.