[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bug with numel() and sparsity?

From: fork
Subject: Re: Bug with numel() and sparsity?
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 00:12:05 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (

Kai Torben Ohlhus <k.ohlhus <at>> writes:

> Your problem might be related to the fact, that the standard octave uses
32 > bit indices rather than 64 bit [1]. 

I don't think so, in that everything else works properly, at least if I
replace numel(x) with prod(size(x)).  

It might be that sedumi should use a different call, but it might be that
numel() could be written so that this doesn't happen.

It's all good, I patched my sedumi copy, just saying.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]