[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: nested functions?
|
From: |
c. |
|
Subject: |
Re: nested functions? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 20 Feb 2014 16:03:55 +0100 |
On 20 Feb 2014, at 13:59, Vic Norton <address@hidden> wrote:
> I don't use any packages, Carlo, but that may be just what I need. What would
> be a nice, simple package to emulate?
Here' the simplest example I can come up with, the package physicalconstants
which has only one non private function.
I'm sending this via mail because carnë has been removing all packages as
simple as this one from Octave Forge.
HTH,
c.
physicalconstants.tar.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
- nested functions?, Vic Norton, 2014/02/18
- Re: nested functions?, Mike Miller, 2014/02/18
- Re: nested functions?, Vic Norton, 2014/02/18
- Re: nested functions?, Mike Miller, 2014/02/18
- Re: nested functions?, Benjamin Abbott, 2014/02/18
- Re: nested functions?, Mike Miller, 2014/02/18
- Re: nested functions?, Vic Norton, 2014/02/18
- Re: nested functions?, fork, 2014/02/19
- Re: nested functions?, c., 2014/02/19
- Re: nested functions?, Vic Norton, 2014/02/20
- Re: nested functions?,
c. <=
- Unmaintained packages on Octave-Forge, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2014/02/20
- Re: Unmaintained packages on Octave-Forge, c., 2014/02/20
- writing packages (Re: nested functions?), Vic Norton, 2014/02/20