help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Statistical test for equality ?


From: stn021
Subject: Re: Statistical test for equality ?
Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 23:18:38 +0100

Hi,

the wikipedia-article about Likelihood-ratio is a bit too much "mathmatese" for me to be sure. Sounds interesting though. Could someone give a short english explanation?

The example in the wikipedia-article seems to me like the answer to a different question than mine. It is about testing whether two coins having the same probability of coming up heads. That would be chi-square or maybe t_test.

My question is more about testing whether the first toss of coin 1 is identical to the first toss of coin 2. Same for the second toss etc.

I do not want to know if the 2 coins both come up heads 50% of the time. Instead I want to know if they both come up with the same side each time. If coin 1 shows heads then coin 2 should show heads too. Same for tails.

The question is _not_ : are the coins alike ?
Instead it is: is it the same coin ?
I do not think that chi-square will answer this. (Correct me if I'm wrong)

Coins are a bad example though. It is more about continuous variables, for example any (rational) number between 0 and 100. The distribution can be assumed to be normal.


THX
stn


2013/12/24 pathematica <address@hidden>
This answer is based on fading memory of something learned in a course taken
long ago and not subsequently used so please excuse its vagueness. I would
have to revise the method to be more specific.

If your model assumes that each pair of component vectors have been drawn
from the same distribution, then I think you need to use the likelihood
ratio test.

Wikipedia page <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Likelihood-ratio_test>

The test statistic raised by this method follows a chi-squared distribution
(with the appropriate number of degrees of freedom). I note that someone has
already suggested a chi-square test (which is sort of not surprising because
you imply Gaussian noise, which has a distribution that belongs to the
exponential family).



-----
However good you think Octave is, it's much, much better.
--
View this message in context: http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Statistical-test-for-equality-tp4660142p4660360.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
Help-octave mailing list
address@hidden
https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]