[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Zero Crossing Rate - optimize implementation
From: |
c. |
Subject: |
Re: Zero Crossing Rate - optimize implementation |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Aug 2012 19:44:01 +0200 |
On 8 May 2010, at 04:22, jacek grabowski wrote:
> 2010/5/8 Akira Nishimura <address@hidden>:
>
>> Nice solution !!
>> You can get rid of the for loop !
>>
>>> zcr = diff(sign(s))~=0;
>>
>> zcr_rate = sum(reshape(zcr(1:framesize*(FN-1)), framesize, FN-1), 1);
>> (...)
>
> Well done gentlemens. I have no more questions.
>
> --
> Jacek Grabowski
Just for completeness,
there is already a function called "zerocrossing" that does what you need in
the "signal" package.
c.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Zero Crossing Rate - optimize implementation,
c. <=