[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: package nan warnings
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: package nan warnings |
Date: |
Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:53:37 -0400 |
On 2 August 2012 15:42, Yin, Yue-Jun <address@hidden> wrote:
> Alois,
> Thank you. I got your point about the agreement issue.
> What is the consequence of shadowing? The performance is enhanced or the
> other way?
The NaN package overwrites core functions, because Alois thinks
they're buggy. I disagree. The reason to overwrite them is that Alois
thinks NaNs should never be propagated in a calculation. The point of
the NaN package is to do this, to never propagate NaNs, but just omit
them from a calculation. So for example, in core Octave sum([1 NaN 2])
is NaN, but in Alois's package it's 3.
- Jordi G. H.
- package nan warnings, Yin, Yue-Jun, 2012/08/01
- Re: package nan warnings, Carnë Draug, 2012/08/01
- Re: package nan warnings, Alois Schloegl, 2012/08/02
- RE: package nan warnings, Yin, Yue-Jun, 2012/08/02
- Re: package nan warnings,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: package nan warnings, Alois Schloegl, 2012/08/02
- Re: package nan warnings, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/08/02
- Re: package nan warnings, Alois Schloegl, 2012/08/02
- Re: package nan warnings, Max Brister, 2012/08/03
- Re: package nan warnings, Alois Schloegl, 2012/08/03
- Re: package nan warnings, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/08/02
- Re: package nan warnings, Alois Schloegl, 2012/08/02
- Re: package nan warnings, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/08/02