Re: M-function signature -- command to show?

[fork]

c. <carlo.defalco <at> gmail.com> writes:

>  you're better off
> writing the signature in the m-file and printing it
> with "print_usage ()"

I try to do this, but oftentimes I am playing around with different versions of
a function, and the comment-documentation gets out of sync with the actual
function definition.

(Plus writing the "signature" in the docs violates the Don't Repeat Yourself
rule to define it twice, but not in a hugely annoying way...).  

Thanks for the other suggestions, by the way.

tx!