On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 04:55:36PM -0400, Doug Stewart wrote:
> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Lukas Reichlin <
>
address@hidden> wrote:
>
> >
> > On 22.05.2012, at 22:44, Doug Stewart wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Lukas Reichlin <
> >
address@hidden> wrote:
> > > On 22.05.2012, at 21:39, Doug Stewart wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Lukas Reichlin <
> >
address@hidden> wrote:
> > > > On 22.05.2012, at 20:14, Doug Stewart wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Could someone try this with 3.7.0+
> > > > > I am finding a crash with
> > > > > sys1=tf(1,[1 3 2])
> > > > >
> > > > > You will need the control pkg.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > DAS
> > > >
> > > > octave:1> sys1=tf(1,[1 3 2])
> > > >
> > > > Transfer function 'sys1' from input 'u1' to output ...
> > > >
> > > > 1
> > > > y1: -------------
> > > > s^2 + 3 s + 2
> > > >
> > > > Continuous-time model.
> > > > octave:2>
> > > >
> > > > I am using Octave 3.6.2-rc0. Have you tried a fresh install of the
> > control package? Possibly the oct-files need to be rebuilt.
> > > >
> > > > Lukas
> > > >
> > > > I know that it works with 3.6.1 and now 3.6.2 what I asked for was the
> > 3.7.0+ development branch.
> > > > Does any one have a recent compile.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > DAS
> > >
> > > See whether
> > >
> > > is_real_vector (1)
> > > is_real_vector ([1 3 2])
> > >
> > > works. is_real_vector is the only oct-file from control which is called
> > by tf.
> > > The code is very simple:
> > >
> >
http://octave.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/octave/trunk/octave-forge/main/control/src/is_real_vector.cc?revision=7855&view=markup
> > >
> > > Have you tried a fresh install of the control package?
> > >
> > > Lukas
> > >
> > >
> > > I tried
> > > is_real_vector (1)
> > > and it crashed. (the window disappeared)
> > >
> > > --
> > > DAS
> >
> > OK, as we have now a simple test case, a core octave developer should have
> > a look at this. I'm afraid I can't help.
> >
> > Lukas
> >
> >
> Thanks Lukas -- I will dig deeper here.
>
> and thanks to Dmitri. (spelled it right this time)