[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: problem (and workaround) compiling arpack-ng_3.1.0
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: problem (and workaround) compiling arpack-ng_3.1.0 |
Date: |
Sat, 12 May 2012 10:59:48 -0700 (PDT) |
----- Original Message -----
> From: Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden>
> To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Cc:
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2012 8:14 PM
> Subject: problem (and workaround) compiling arpack-ng_3.1.0
>
> Hello,
>
> since arpack-ng_3.1.0 is also developed by Octave developers, this may be a
> proper list to publish my findings.
>
> I had my "favorite" "'make' fails even though
> 'configure' is OK" problem, particularly, the message was:
>
> "
>
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/build/arpack-ng_3.1.0/PARPACK/UTIL/MPI'
> /mnt/sdb8/sergei/AFSWD_debug/20120424/bash-4.2/bin/bash ../../../libtool
> --tag=F77 --mode=compile -g -O2 -c -o pivout.lo pivout.f
> libtool: compile: unrecognized option `-g'
> ".
>
> Actually, there are two problematic files producing such error messages:
>
> arpack-ng_3.1.0/PARPACK/UTIL/MPI/Makefile
> arpack-ng_3.1.0/PARPACK/SRC/MPI/Makefile
>
> - somehow F77 is undefined in them - I am using self-built gcc-4.5.3 and it
> has
> 'gfortran' and in other places, starting from 'configure', it
> works OK.
>
> The workaround is to run 'make F77=gfortran' rather than just
> 'make'.
>
> I think this should be fixed.
>
> Thanks,
> Sergei.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
Oh, the issue has already been reported:
http://forge.scilab.org/index.php/p/arpack-ng/issues/689/ , and they offer a
different workaround.
Whatever.
Regards,
Sergei.
>