Re: Compiling Matlab package under Octave

[Sergei Steshenko]

----- Original Message -----
> From: Przemek Klosowski <address@hidden>
> To: "address@hidden" <address@hidden>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, May 8, 2012 12:35 AM
> Subject: Re: Compiling Matlab package under Octave
> 
> On 04/30/2012 09:18 AM, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> 
>>  The license is not much worse than GPL.
>> 
>>  They even promote free software:
>>  "
>>  4. You may not use or modify EasySpin or a part of it for other software 
> which is not freely available at no cost.
>>  ".
> 
> Sure, they promote Free Software, but only by making their conditions so 
> contorted and unreasonable that in comparison FOSS looks golden. Let me see: 
> you 
> can't modify EasySpin to make it work with Octave, AND you can't modify 
> it 'for other software which is not freely available'. Makes perfect 
> sense.
> _______________________________________________
.

AFAIR, they don't say you can't modify EasySpin to work with Octave.

I think that if a P-code interpreter is implemented for/in Octave, EasySpin 
will just work with Octave the same way it works with Matlab.

Regards,
  Sergei.