[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: "optim needs miscellaneous >= 1.0.10" problem
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: "optim needs miscellaneous >= 1.0.10" problem |
Date: |
Sun, 1 Apr 2012 17:19:56 -0400 |
On 1 April 2012 17:02, Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden> wrote:
> I'm wondering hoe many years it will take to convince that Octave
> and packages should be released in conjunction with each other.
We're not doing this to spite you. OF Packages are released separately
because it's too much work to do it together and OF package developers
sometimes see Octave as a foreign black box instead of something they
should work with.
- Jordi G. H.
- "optim needs miscellaneous >= 1.0.10" problem, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/04/01
- Re: "optim needs miscellaneous >= 1.0.10" problem, Thomas Weber, 2012/04/01
- Re: "optim needs miscellaneous >= 1.0.10" problem, Sergei Steshenko, 2012/04/03
- Re: "optim needs miscellaneous >= 1.0.10" problem, marco atzeri, 2012/04/03
- Re: "optim needs miscellaneous >= 1.0.10" problem, John W. Eaton, 2012/04/01