[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: named arguments
|
From: |
John W. Eaton |
|
Subject: |
Re: named arguments |
|
Date: |
Fri, 16 Mar 2012 12:39:04 -0400 |
On 16-Mar-2012, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso wrote:
| Really? How? Without futzing around with varargin and testing for
| string equality?
Yes, you have to use varargin and look for strings.
You could also use an option structure.
As Olaf said, I don't think it is wise to invent new syntax.
jwe
- named arguments, Juan Pablo Carbajal, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Olaf Till, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Michael Goffioul, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Olaf Till, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, John W. Eaton, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: named arguments, Michael Goffioul, 2012/03/16
- RE: named arguments, Damian Harty, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, fork, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, John W. Eaton, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, fork, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Miguel Bazdresch, 2012/03/16
- Re: named arguments, Francesco Potortì, 2012/03/17
- Re: named arguments, CdeMills, 2012/03/16