[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: function help
From: |
Ben Abbott |
Subject: |
Re: function help |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Feb 2012 17:06:17 -0500 |
On Feb 23, 2012, at 3:46 PM, "damian.harty" <address@hidden> wrote:
> martin_helm wrote
>>
>> Because by design all the additional function definitions in the .m file
>> are local and hidden to the outside world.
>>
>
> Well, that's the bit I'm not getting. If they are in the script file I'm
> working in, they don't get much more local than that, do they? I can
> understand why they would be invisible, say, from the command line despite
> being present in a script, but I can't understand why they aren't visible
> when they are /in this file/ and why instead they /have to be in a file with
> their own name/.
>
> Nevertheless, that's how it is, and I need separate files for any functions
> that I write or else do that init thing. I'll live. But it ain't about
> "local"...
>
> Damian
If a function in a *script* is named "addr()" and you call "add()" you're
calling something other than the function you named addr
Ben
- function help, Tom Bohdan, 2012/02/23
- Re: function help, Doug Stewart, 2012/02/23
- Re: function help, Ben Abbott, 2012/02/23
- Re: function help, damian.harty, 2012/02/23
- Re: function help, damian.harty, 2012/02/23
- Re: function help, Jordi GutiƩrrez Hermoso, 2012/02/23
- Re: function help,
Ben Abbott <=
- Re: function help, Ben Abbott, 2012/02/23
- RE: function help, Damian Harty, 2012/02/24
- Re: function help, Doug Stewart, 2012/02/24
- Re: function help, damian.harty, 2012/02/24
- Re: function help, Doug Stewart, 2012/02/24
- Re: function help, Doug Stewart, 2012/02/24
- Re: function help, Ben Abbott, 2012/02/24
- Re: function help, Doug Stewart, 2012/02/24
- Re: function help, Ben Abbott, 2012/02/25
- Re: function help, Doug Stewart, 2012/02/25