[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: feval(@fun,...) vs. feval("fun",...)
|
From: |
Muhali |
|
Subject: |
Re: feval(@fun,...) vs. feval("fun",...) |
|
Date: |
Fri, 3 Feb 2012 20:26:30 -0800 (PST) |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso-2 wrote
>
> What was the example?
>
quite complicated, including recursive function calls etc.
I'll try to distill the essentials.
So in theory, are feval(@fun) and feval("fun") equivalent?
M.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/feval-fun-vs-feval-fun-tp4356410p4356530.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.