[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: var(1) = 0 ??
From: |
Muhali |
Subject: |
Re: var(1) = 0 ?? |
Date: |
Fri, 27 Jan 2012 13:40:25 -0800 (PST) |
var(1) = 0 is at least in conflict with the standard definition of the
unbiased estimate, where the sum of squared deviations is scaled by n-1 (n
sample size).
But common sense has it that a sample of size 1 simply has *no* variance, so
the result is basically a convention; it just hurts my math feelings to see
var(1) = 0.
M.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/var-1-0-tp4334677p4334792.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- var(1) = 0 ??, Muhali, 2012/01/27
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, Ismael Núñez-Riboni, 2012/01/27
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??,
Muhali <=
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, c., 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, pathematica, 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, c., 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, pathematica, 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, pathematica, 2012/01/28
- Re: var(1) = 0 ??, c., 2012/01/28