[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4
From: |
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso |
Subject: |
Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4 |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Oct 2011 16:36:58 -0500 |
2011/10/17 Uwe Brauer <address@hidden>:
>
> > On 17 October 2011 11:45, octaveuser001 <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > QtOctave is abandoned. Yes, it has problems with fltk and debugging.
> > We're working on a replacement GUI, but it probably won't be available
> > for a while. I don't have an easy solution for you. Either stay with
> > 3.2 if it works for you, or debug from the CLI. Emacs also works as an
> > interface to Octave's debugger, but it has a steep learning curve, and
> > you might not want to climb this curve.
>
>
>
> That is frankly a huge problem and prevents new users to
> switch :(
Then help us. Clone the Octave Mercurial sources and work on the gui
branch. It's Qt, which is one of the nicest languages you can derive
from C++ (strictly speaking, Qt is a new language derived from C++).
There isn't much more I can tell you. I know it's a problem, but we
need help solving it. Talk is cheap. Let's write some code.
- Jordi G. H.
- QTOctave and Octave 3.4, octaveuser001, 2011/10/17
- Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/10/17
- Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4, Uwe Brauer, 2011/10/17
- Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4,
Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso <=
- Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4, Uwe Brauer, 2011/10/18
- Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/10/18
- Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4, Jordi Gutiérrez Hermoso, 2011/10/18
- Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4, Uwe Brauer, 2011/10/19
- Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4, Uwe Brauer, 2011/10/19
Re: QTOctave and Octave 3.4, Balogh Richard, Ing., 2011/10/18