help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: qp(): how do I get a simple inequality constraint?


From: fork
Subject: Re: qp(): how do I get a simple inequality constraint?
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:09:28 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/)

Leo Butler <l.butler <at> cmich.edu> writes:

> 
> fork <forkandwait <at> gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Seems to me that "lb" and "ub" and "A_lb" can be all be set with the right
> > (possibly negative) entries in A_in and A_ub.  Is that true?
> 
> Yes. The cost is paid in the size of A_in and A_ub.

Cool. Is there a substantial computational cost to only using A_in and A_ub?

I will probably never use lb and ub and A_lb.  I know they are in there for ML
compatibility, but I think they are actually more confusing then helpful, unless
they provide a speedup.
 
> I take it that your original question is resolved?

Yes.  I am not sure if my results will be useful, but it was definitely
interesting to learn how to use qp(), and I it would have been A LOT harder
without your help.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]