help-octave
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: foo_cs = foo{:} - feature or bug ? (octave-3.4.2); also, sizeof(foo{


From: marco atzeri
Subject: Re: foo_cs = foo{:} - feature or bug ? (octave-3.4.2); also, sizeof(foo{:})
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 14:15:31 +0200



On Monday, August 8, 2011, Sergei Steshenko <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> here is a screen session:
>
> "
>
>
> octave:1> foo{1,1} = "a"
> foo =
> {
>  [1,1] = a
> }
> octave:2> foo{1,2} = "b"
> foo =
> {
>  [1,1] = a
>  [1,2] = b
> }
> octave:3> foo{2,1} = [1 2]
> foo =
> {
>  [1,1] = a
>  [2,1] =
>
>     1   2
>
>  [1,2] = b
>  [2,2] = [](0x0)
> }
> octave:4> foo_cs = foo{:}
> foo_cs = a
> octave:5> sizeof(foo{:})
> error: Invalid call to sizeof.  Correct usage is:
>
>  -- Built-in Function:  sizeof (VAL)
>
>
> Additional help for built-in functions and operators is
> available in the on-line version of the manual.  Use the command
> `doc <topic>' to search the manual index.
>
> Help and information about Octave is also available on the WWW
> at http://www.octave.org and via the address@hidden
> mailing list.
> octave:5> sizeof(foo_cs)
> ans =  1
> octave:6> sizeof(1 + 2)
> ans =  8
> octave:7> sizeof(foo)
> ans =  18
> octave:8>
> ".
>
> Questions:
>
> 1) why is it so that 'foo_cs' shows just one element (and its 'sizeof' is
> indeer 1 - see above) :
As John tried to explain two times
Foo{:} is not an objet, but comma separated list of objects.
size(foo{:}) is like size(foo{1},foo{2}, ...,foo(end))
that is wrong.
To have the size of an object try
size([foo{:}])

> "
> octave:4> foo_cs = foo{:}
> foo_cs = a
> "
> ?
>
> 2) why "sizeof(foo{:})" refuses to work while "sizeof(1 + 2)" and
> "sizeof(foo)" work ? I think "foo{:}" occupies some bytes in memory, so
> 'sizeof' taking it as its argument should make sense.
>
> Thanks,
>  Sergei.
> _______________________________________________
> Help-octave mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://mailman.cae.wisc.edu/listinfo/help-octave
>
reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]