[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: octave plotting vs. gnuplot plotting
|
From: |
Ben Abbott |
|
Subject: |
Re: octave plotting vs. gnuplot plotting |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2011 20:18:07 -0400 |
On Jul 26, 2011, at 7:24 PM, Ben Abbott wrote:
> On Jul 26, 2011, at 6:50 PM, Muhali <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I don't seem to be able to get nice octave plots with the gnuplot backend. If
>> you compare this figure from gnuplot
>>
>> http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n3697226/gnuplot.png
>>
>> with this one from octave
>>
>> http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/file/n3697226/octave.png
>>
>> the difference is pretty obvious. What am I doing wrong?
>>
>> M.
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/octave-plotting-vs-gnuplot-plotting-tp3697226p3697226.html
>
> The gnuplot version is using the wxt terminal, and includes a line object.
> You can get the same result in Octave by ...
>
> setenv ("GNUTERM", "wxt");
> x = (-10):0.01:10;
> plot (x, sin(x), "r")
> title ("What?")
> legend ("sin(x)")
>
> Ben
To get the font you want for all text ...
setenv ("GNUTERM", "wxt");
set (0, "defaulttextfontname", "Linux Biolinum")
set (0, "defaultaxesfontname", "Linux Biolinum")
x = (-10):0.01:10;
plot (x, sin(x), "r")
title ("What?")
legend ("sin(x)")
Ben