|
From: | Daniel Arteaga |
Subject: | Re: Octave 3.4.2 with fltk support |
Date: | Tue, 28 Jun 2011 09:55:30 +0200 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; ca-ES; rv:1.9.2.17) Gecko/20110516 Thunderbird/3.1.10 |
Al 27/06/11 21:02, En/na Martin Helm ha escrit:
Am Montag, 27. Juni 2011, 20:00:04 schrieb Daniel Arteaga:Al 27/06/11 16:23, En/na Martin Helm ha escrit:Am Montag, 27. Juni 2011, 15:57:52 schrieb Daniel Arteaga:Hi, How can I compile octave 3.4.2 with fltk support, under Ubuntu 11.04 64 bits?[...]with no success so far. I have the necessary dependencies installed, in particular the ubuntu package libfltk1.1-dev. Otherwise compilation works well. Thank you very much, Daniellibfltk1.1-dev is for sure not enough, it is awhile ago I tested building 3.4 on a ubuntu (I am an openSUSE user) but the simplest way to ensure that the dependencies are met is to install the build dependencies for 3.2 first. sudo apt-get build-dep octave3.2 and run ./configure (you should not need any switches here) afterwards. If it does not help can you post the configure log, I can at least check for you what you need in a virtual machine if no ubuntu user jumps in here.I already installed all build-dep for octave3.2. I attach the (compressed) config.log after doing ./configure. Thank you very much, DanielCan you tell in detail what does not work. From your configure log file I have to conclude that it should work. You also say your compile goes well, so when does an error happen and what is the error?
I found no error in compilation, but when I run Octave I get: octave:1> version ans = 3.4.2 octave:2> available_graphics_toolkits ans = { [1,1] = gnuplot } octave:3> graphics_toolkit("gnuplot") octave:4> graphics_toolkit("fltk")error: feval: /usr/local/lib/octave/3.4.2/oct/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/__init_fltk__.oct: failed to load: /usr/local/lib/octave/3.4.2/oct/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/__init_fltk__.oct: undefined symbol: _ZN9Fl_Window5flushEv
error: called from:error: /usr/local/share/octave/3.4.2/m/plot/graphics_toolkit.m at line 56, column 5
Besides that Octave works perfectly Thank you once more, Daniel
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |