Re: Linking to external static (!) library

[TOT]

martin_helm wrote:
> 
> To come back to your library: Is the use of the options for the
> compilation 
> really so much splitted to different places? I would usually think that it
> has 
> some central makefile or a configure script which makes it easy to
> recompile the 
> whole thing with minimal effort.
> 

Yes it is. The library were build in early 80s so it's obsolete by means of
configure script. The make file is a peace of art by it's own. I already
tried to make it shared by it refused to compile on other computers in the
grid - so I put it away for someone to help me in the future...

Any other ideas?
What about matlab - does it behave the same by means of static linking?


Regards,
Anar

-----
Back to the future!
--
View this message in context: 
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/Linking-to-external-static-library-tp3461005p3462963.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.