[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: saving Octave state?
From: |
Olaf Till |
Subject: |
Re: saving Octave state? |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Nov 2010 21:52:43 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 03:14:58PM -0500, John W. Eaton wrote:
> On 30-Nov-2010, Mike Miller wrote:
>
> | I decided to mimic the R filenames and call the data and history files
> | .OData and .Ohistory (instead of .RData and .Rhistory). This is in my
> | ~/.octaverc file:
> |
> |
> | history_file (".Ohistory");
> | if ( exist(".OData", "file") == 2 )
> | load(".OData") ;
> | endif
> |
> |
> | So it automatically loads history and data, if they are present. I'm not
> | sure if any aspect of the state of the previous instance of Octave would
> | be missed when I launch Octave in the same directory if I had done this
> | just before quitting the previous time:
> |
> | save .OData
> |
> | What do you think?
>
> Use a function to do this with atexit if you want to ensure that this
> happens every time Octave quits.
>
> The only thing I can think of that you are not saving is the internal
> state managed by functions like more, octave_core_file_name,
> output_precision, etc. If you have changed any of these from their
> defaults, that info will not be saved and restored automatically.
I think there is another one: If a function returns a handle to its
subfunction, this handle can be saved but not restored to something
useful.
(This would be nice to change, but I can imagine that this is
difficult ...)
Olaf