[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Matlab to Octave - precision and differential equations
From: |
Sergei Steshenko |
Subject: |
Re: Matlab to Octave - precision and differential equations |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Oct 2010 07:41:26 -0700 (PDT) |
--- On Mon, 10/4/10, Dotan Cohen <address@hidden> wrote:
> From: Dotan Cohen <address@hidden>
> Subject: Re: Matlab to Octave - precision and differential equations
> To: "Sergei Steshenko" <address@hidden>
> Cc: "fork" <address@hidden>, "Doug Stewart" <address@hidden>, address@hidden
> Date: Monday, October 4, 2010, 5:17 AM
> On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 14:05, Sergei
> Steshenko <address@hidden>
> wrote:
> > You rather probably need a different numerical
> method.
> >
>
> Depends on whether he is doing research or development. For
> modeling
> gravity to determine a natural object's trajectory through
> the solar
> system, four or eight significant figures might do. For
> actually
> sending a probeto Neptune via a Jupiter gravity assist, he
> will need
> considerably more!
>
> --
> Dotan Cohen
>
> http://gibberish.co.il
> http://what-is-what.com
>
Well, still debatable. I.e. the core issue can still be the numerical
method.
A known method is to take a differential equation with known analytical
solution, preferably not very "smooth" solution, and to solve it using
the numerical method under question.
Then to compare the solutions.
I think most actual orbits have been calculated using FORTRAN and
what is called nowadays "double float" (in "C" terms) type.
Regards,
Sergei.
Re: Matlab to Octave - precision and differential equations, Ben Barrowes, 2010/10/05