[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: parcellfun and rand
From: |
Muhali |
Subject: |
Re: parcellfun and rand |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Sep 2010 12:11:32 -0700 (PDT) |
Francesco Potortì wrote:
>
> For Monte Carlo simulations, note that they are not reproducible, as the
> number of jobs scheduled to each process is not predictable.
>
which gives you another interesting random number generator ;-)
I guess no way of making it reproducible? - But thanks anyway.
M.
--
View this message in context:
http://octave.1599824.n4.nabble.com/parcellfun-and-rand-tp2526487p2530258.html
Sent from the Octave - General mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- parcellfun and rand, Muhali, 2010/09/04
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/09/04
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Francesco Potortì, 2010/09/04
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Francesco Potortì, 2010/09/04
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Muhali, 2010/09/05
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Muhali, 2010/09/07
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Francesco Potortì, 2010/09/07
- Re: parcellfun and rand,
Muhali <=
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Francesco Potortì, 2010/09/07
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/09/08
- Re: parcellfun and rand, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/09/08