[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Block comments inside block comments
From: |
John W. Eaton |
Subject: |
Re: Block comments inside block comments |
Date: |
Wed, 24 Mar 2010 17:40:55 -0400 |
On 23-Mar-2010, Carn Draug wrote:
| @@ -208,7 +232,10 @@
| "Return list delimiter. See also `]'."),
|
| pair_type ("\\",
| - "Left division operator. See also `/' and `./'."),
| + "Left division operator. See also `/' and `./'.\n\
| +\n\
| +The backslash character can also be used as continuation marker\n\
| +character. See also `...'."),
I would rather not encourage the use of the backslash character for
continuations, so please remove this change from the next version of
the patch that you submit.
Please also include a ChangeLog entry for your changes, and if you are
using Mercurial, please submit a changeset instead of a plain diff.
If you are not using Mercurial, then please start using it for working
on Octave.
Thanks,
jwe
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, (continued)
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/03/16
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, John W. Eaton, 2010/03/16
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, Jaroslav Hajek, 2010/03/16
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, Carnë Draug, 2010/03/16
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, John W. Eaton, 2010/03/16
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, Carnë Draug, 2010/03/23
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, Søren Hauberg, 2010/03/24
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, Carnë Draug, 2010/03/24
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, Søren Hauberg, 2010/03/24
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, John W. Eaton, 2010/03/24
- Re: Block comments inside block comments,
John W. Eaton <=
- Re: Block comments inside block comments, Carnë Draug, 2010/03/24