Re: Allocating N-dimensional Array in C++

[Søren Hauberg]

tor, 18 03 2010 kl. 16:41 -0400, skrev John W. Eaton:
> Any objection to removing the
> 
>   dim_vector (const octave_idx_type *vec, size_t vec_size)
> 
> construtor?  Or is there some big advantage to having this constructor
> that outweighs the negatives of it being an unsafe constructor since
> there is no way to ensure that the length of the array pointed to by
> VEC is at least VEC_SIZE elements?

I guess having short-hand constructors for up to 7 dimensions will be
enough to cover 99.9% of all use-cases. So, I would be okay with this
constructor being removed.

Søren